-
By virtue of the AGPA dt.29-11-2006, the assessee has parted with his right in the property because he had received the entire sale consideration as agreed to between both the parties and has also handedover the vacant possession of the property to the Vendee therein. It is also stated therein that the GPA is given to the Vendee for the convenience of the purchaser for doing the necessary acts and things on behalf of the Vendor and the Vendee therein.
SAMA OM REDDY, HYDERABAD VERSUS THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-8 (2) , HYDERABAD
(2020) TaxCorp(LJ) 22438 (ITAT-HYDERABAD) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=83084&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
Without following the procedure as contemplated u/s. 144C of the Act the AO issued demand notice and penalty notice. Thereby, in our opinion, the final assessment order 28-04-2014 passed u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. 144C(3) of the Act lacked validity and it is liable to be quashed.
VANDERLANDE INDUSTRIES B.V., C/O VIPL VERSUS ASST. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) – II, HYDERABAD
(2020) TaxCorp(LJ) 22422 (ITAT-HYDERABAD) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=83022&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
It is not in dispute that the assessee has obtained the cash from his own brother-in-law. It is also not in dispute that the assessee obtained the cash loan for the purpose of acquiring immovable property wherein he was constrained to resciend the agreement in the event the balance purchase consideration is not paid within the stipulated time and in such event the transaction has to be reversed.
A. VIJAY KUMAR, HYDERABAD. VERSUS DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE – 4 (1) , HYDERABAD.
(2020) TaxCorp(LJ) 22325 (ITAT-HYDERABAD) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=82627&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
Though the Act mandates Tax Residency Certificate of Austria, non-production of the same before the Ld. Revenue Authorities shall not enable the Ld. Revenue Authorities not to grant the benefit of the Treaty to the assesse.
Sreenivasa Reddy Cheemalamarri Vs Income-tax Officer
(2020) TaxCorp(LJ) 22233 (ITAT-HYDERABAD)
-
There is no transfer of property by the assessees in fact it is acquisition of property by the assessees in the names of their children and it is not the case of transfer or gain on sale of property.
Smt. R.Mangala Devi Vs Income Tax Officer
(2020) TaxCorp(LJ) 22232 (ITAT-HYDERABAD)
-
Explanation to section 80IA(4) makes it clear that infrastructure facility means a water supply project, water treatment system, irrigation project, sanitation and sewage system or solid waste management system. From the above, it is abundantly clear that the assessee shall be entitled for deduction u/s. 80IA(4) with respect to operating and maintaining of the water treatment system / water supply project. It is also clear that the assessee is not a developer but only operating and maintaining the water treatment system / water supply project.
THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-17 (2), HYDERABAD. VERSUS M/S. WATERLIFE INDIA PVT. LTD. (VICE-VERSA)
(2020) TaxCorp(LJ) 21066 (ITAT-HYDERABAD) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=81953&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
Assessee utilized 100% capabilities of employees without allowing the employees on bench, it had no idle employees on its rolls, it incurred no interest costs and it paid a rent amounting to 0.5% of revenue whereas in other cases it was around 5%.
Annapurna Business Solutions Vs Dy.Commissioner of Income Tax
(2020) TaxCorp(LJ) 20791 (ITAT-HYDERABAD) · Section 10A
-
Liability of the assessee to pay at the revised price is an ascertained liability and not a contingent liability as held by the Revenue. The assessee was liable to pay the revised charges w.e.f. 1.12.2008 but the revised charges were not finalized though the maximum price which could be revised or increased was mentioned in the communication from GAIL. DR’s submissions that the price is fixed by the Govt. is also strictly not correct.
ANDHRA PRADESH GAS POWER CORPORATION LIMITED VERSUS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1 (1), HYDERABAD
(2020) TaxCorp(LJ) 20750 (ITAT-HYDERABAD) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=81133&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
Land deal in question was made by the appellant. Mis SMV agencies is also a company in the same group and the entire management is made by the aforementioned two persons. There is no doubt that a substantial amount of on money was paid and these amounts are clearly written in cash in the papers referred to supra.
CHARMINAR BOTTLING COMPANY PVT. LTD. VERSUS ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE – 8 (1) , HYDERABAD.
(2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 20749 (ITAT-HYDERABAD) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=81134&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
The liability to pay the revised price had accrued during the relevant A.Ys when GAIL had intimated the likely revision of the price and only date of the payment thereof was uncertain and therefore, the provision has to be allowed as per the mercantile system of accounting followed by the assesse. There is an implicit obligation of the assessee to pay the revised price, the liability of the assessee to pay at the revised price is an ascertained liability and not a contingent liability as held by the Revenue.
A.P. Gas Power Corporation Ltd Vs Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax
(2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 20537 (ITAT-HYDERABAD) · Section 37
-
What has to be disallowed under Explanation 1 to Sec.37(1) of the Act is a payment made, for contravention of laws in force in India and not of any foreign country.
Mylan Laboratories Limited Vs Dy.CIT
(2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 20431 (ITAT-HYDERABAD)
-
The assessee would be eligible for benefit of deduction u/s 54F towards the independent houses received provided other conditions stipulated in the act are fulfilled.
Sri Potla Nageswara Rao Vs Income Tax Officer
(2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 20398 (ITAT-HYDERABAD)
-
From the penalty order, we find that the assessee has not filed any Explanation before the A.O. except requesting the A.O. to keep the proceedings in abeyance till the assessee’s appeal before the ITAT is disposed of. The AO, however, concluded the proceedings by observing that the assessee has not submitted any explanation to the show cause notice dated 14.3.2012 issued u/s 271AAA r.w.s. 274.
JANARDHAN REDDY BEKKERY, HYDERABAD. VERSUS ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3 (PRESENTLY DCIT, CIRCLE – 6 (1) HYDERABAD.)
(2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 20230 (ITAT-HYDERABAD) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=78291&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
The intention of the legislature for giving the exemption u/s 80IB(11A) is to promote agro processing industries as is evident from the Finance Ministers speech and also memorandum explaining the amendments to the bill. There is no doubt that oil palm fresh fruit bunches are agricultural products. They may not be edible in their raw or ripe form, but they extract therefore after processing is edible. The language used in the section itself is processing, preservation and packaging of fruits or vegetables. Thus, the legislature was aware of the fact that certain fruits and vegetables would require processing and preservation for their long shelf-life. As long as the end product is also consumable it cannot be denied exemption u/s 80IB(11A). Therefore we are satisfied that the oil palm fruits are fruits u/s 80IB(11A) of the Act.
3F OIL PALM AGROTECH PRIVATE LIMITED VERSUS ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2 (2) , HYDERABAD
(2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 20062 (ITAT-HYDERABAD) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=77598&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
No amount was outstanding as per the recitals of the sale deed. There was no mention with regard to the fact that the Managing director has given promissory note towards part of sale consideration in the sale deed. As per CIT(A), there was no entry in the company’s books of accounts with regard to amounts received from Sri K.Mallesh for pending sale consideration. Therefore, we are unable to accept the contention of the assessee that the transactions were related to the company in respect of sale transaction of Agreement cum GPA dated 27.06.2001.
M. MALA KONDAIAH VERSUS ADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL RANGE VISAKHAPATNAM
(2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 19988 (ITAT-HYDERABAD) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=77372&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
In our view, section 43A has no application considering the fact that the fixed assets were purchased in Indian currency and only the term loan was converted into FCNR and back to rupee loan.
SRI RAMADAS PAPER BOARDS (P) LTD., HYDERABAD. VERSUS DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE – 3 (2), HYDERABAD.
(2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 19845 (ITAT-HYDERABAD) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=76939&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
We do not agree with the TPO that ALP is ‘NIL’ and he analysed the management services on benefit test. There is no such method in the TP study. You cannot adopt a method which is not embedded in the study.
ADAMA INDIA PVT. LTD. VERSUS INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD – 1 (3), HYDERABAD
(2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 19755 (ITAT-HYDERABAD) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=76619&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
Delay in construction due to the fault of the builder / promoter wherein the assessee has no control over the builder/promoter for such delay cannot be attributed to the assesse.
Sri Siva Ramakrishna Mulpuri Vs Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax
(2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 19711 (ITAT-HYDERABAD)
-
We noticed that assessee has completed the registration on 07/03/2009 and the document indicates that it was prepared on 02/03/2009. The registration formalities were completed only on 07/03/2009 and suitably modifying the document in hand writing.
INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD – 2, KURNOOL VERSUS B. NAGA MAHESH, KURNOOL
(2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 19685 (ITAT-HYDERABAD) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=76456&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
Client Code modification made by the broker are made by broker itself.
Canara Securities Ltd Vs DCIT
(2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 19642 (ITAT-HYDERABAD)
Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.