-
ITAT - DIT(E) was wholly bent on refusing registration on various extraneous considerations and exceeded jurisdiction by not following jurisdictional HC ruling
Agricultural Market Committee, Achampet vs DIT(E)
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4586 (ITAT-HYDERABAD)
-
ITAT - Passing of bundle of rights in land to the consortium enabling enjoyment of immovable property constitutes 'transfer' u/s 2(47)(vi)
Andhra Networks Limited vs DCFT
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4579 (ITAT-HYDERABAD)
-
S. 2(47)/ 53A: Mere handing over possession pursuant to development agreement does not result in transfer if developer has not taken steps for development of property
ACIT. vs. B. Rajamallu
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4567 (ITAT-HYDERABAD) · Section. 2(47), 53A
-
For constituting a long-term capital asset, date of allotment of property and not date of registration to be considered. Benevolent approach should be adopted and not a hyper-technical or legalistic one
Andhra Networks Limited vs. DCIT
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4566 (ITAT-HYDERABAD)
-
ITAT - No Sec 195 TDS on payments made to foreign entities for complete source code of software as not being royalty but copyright
ACIT. vs. Bartronics India Ltd.
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4554 (ITAT-HYDERABAD)
-
Consideration for use of software is not assessable as royalty under Article 12 of DTAA and s. 9(1)(vi)
ADIT vs. Bartronics India Ltd
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4535 (ITAT-HYDERABAD) · Section 9(1)(vi)
-
ITAT - Pre-clinical research payments are in the nature of FTS
Dr Reddy’s Research Foundation vs. DCIT
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4523 (ITAT-HYDERABAD)
-
ITAT - Assessee entitled to deduction on expenditure of capital nature when used for scientific research relating to assessee's business
DCIT vs. AVRA Laboratories P. Ltd.
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4519 (ITAT-HYDERABAD)
-
Whether when the Tribunal has decided that there is no violation of provisions of section 11(5) by the assessee, the DIT(E) can reopen the same for cancellation of registration
NIMMAGADDA FOUNDATION Vs. DIT
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4339 (ITAT-HYDERABAD) · Income Tax - Sections 11, 11(5), 12AA, 13(1)(d), 154
-
Sec 292BB would operate prospectively as it curtails the right of the assessee
M/s. Ghanshyamdas Gems and Jewels v/s DCIT
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4321 (ITAT-HYDERABAD) · Section. 292BB
-
Law on whether income from rent for lease of space in technology park and income from operation and management of facilities is assessable as "business profits" or "income from house property" explained
K. Raheja IT Park (Hyderabad) P. Ltd. vs. CIT
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4315 (ITAT-HYDERABAD)
-
The only requirement of s. 249(4) is payment of tax due on returned income. There is no time limit prescribed for payment of such taxes. The delay in filing an appeal after payment of SA tax can be condoned
Kanchenjunga Greenlands Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4301 (ITAT-HYDERABAD) · Section. 249(4)
-
S. 271(1)(c): Apart from falsity of the explanation, the department must have cogent material or evidence from which it could be inferred that assessee has consciously concealed particulars of income or deliberately furnished inaccurate particulars of income
G. K. Properties Pvt. Limited vs. ITO
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4296 (ITAT-HYDERABAD) · Section. 271(1)(c)
-
Fraud in determination of LIBOR/ EURIBOR no reason to discard it as ALP
Vijay Electricals Limited vs. ACIT
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4288 (ITAT-HYDERABAD)
-
S. 2(1A): Gains from sale of agricultural land is exempt even though purchaser intends to use the land for commercial purposes
DCIT. vs. M. Kalyan Chakravarthy
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4281 (ITAT-HYDERABAD) · Section. 2(1A)
-
Transfer pricing principles on right of TPO to collect info u/s 133(6), exclusion of high profit comparables, adjustment for limited risk environment, exclusion of reimbursement costs for computing operation margins explained
HSBC Electronic Data Processing India vs. ACIT
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4279 (ITAT-HYDERABAD) · Section. 133(6)
-
In view of the finding of the service-tax authorities that services were rendered, argument that amount paid is a reimbursement of actual cost without profit element is not acceptable and it is chargeable as “fee for included services”
AMD Research & Development Center vs. DCIT
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4271 (ITAT-HYDERABAD)
-
TPO cannot question commercial expediency of payment to AE. RBI approval to a transaction implies it is at arms' length price
DCIT. Vs. Owens Corning Industries (India) Pvt. Ltd.
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4269 (ITAT-HYDERABAD)
-
Whether where any item is excluded for the purpose of computing export turnover, it it calls for necessary exclusion of the same from total turnover for purpose of computing deduction u/s 10A
M/s PAREXEL INTERNATIONAL INDIA PVT LTD. Vs. ACIT
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4213 (ITAT-HYDERABAD) · Income tax - Sections 10AA, 92CA(1), 133(6), 143(3), 144C(5)
Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.