-
ITAT - Distribution Partner cannot be treated as deemed AEs u/s 92A(2)(i), therefore the very basis of ALP adjustments ceases to hold good in law.
Orchid Pharma Limited (earlier known as Orchid Chemicals and Pharmaceuticals Ltd) Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Co Circle 5 (1) , Chennai
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11585 (ITAT-CHENNAI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenINTL.aspx?ID=11034&Category=INTLDecisions&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - Assessing Officer was justified in directly issuing the assessment order under section 143(3), without first issuing a draft assessment order, even though the assessee was an ‘eligible assessee’ under section 144C, as the Assessing Officer did not propose to make any variations in the income returned by the assessee.
Mosbacher India LLC Versus Additional Director of Income Tax International Taxation- I, Chennai
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11583 (ITAT-CHENNAI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=52382&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - Amount received on transfer of participation rights/interests in oil banks and overriding royalty interest is taxable as capital gains and not business income u/s 42(2)(b).
Mosbacher India LLC vs. ACIT
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11572 (ITAT-CHENNAI) · Section. 42(2)(b)
-
ITAT - Expenditure incurred for sponsoring of special box to watch cricket match is not allowable as business promotion expenditure as it is difficult to imagine how 15 persons sitting in an air-conditioned box and watching a cricket match would help the business of the assessee.
M/s Sumeru Soft Pvt. Ltd Vresus The Income Tax Officer, Company Ward VI (1), Chennai
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11557 (ITAT-CHENNAI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=52262&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - Depreciation at higher rate is applicable on dumpers and pay loaders (business of transportation of goods on hire).
The Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax Non-Corporate Circle 2, Chennai Versus Shri Suthanther Assumtha 1,
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11486 (ITAT-CHENNAI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=51448&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - A co-operative bank was eligible for deduction u/s. 36(1)(viia) towards provision made for bad and doubtful debts.
Kancheepuram Central Cooperative Bank Ltd. vs. DCIT
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11454 (ITAT-CHENNAI)
-
ITAT - Amount received by a Switzerland company pursuant to contract from NHPC is taxable in India assessee’s Indian subsidiary represented through its MD constitutes assessee’s fixed place PE in India.
Carpi Tech SA vs. ADIT
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11453 (ITAT-CHENNAI)
-
Article 5 DTAA: Law explained as to when a "power of attorney" holder of a non-resident can constitute a "dependent agent", "fixed place of business" and a "permanent establishment" under Article 5 of the DTAA. The fact that the physical presence of the non-resident in India is nominal is irrelevant
Carpi Tech SA vs. ADIT
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11439 (ITAT-CHENNAI)
-
ITAT - Software expenses representing reimbursement of software cost to parent company cannot be held as ‘royalties’ under Article 12 of DTAA or ‘FTS’ u/s 9(1 )(vii). No TDS u/s 195.
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Company Circle 1 (1), Chennai Versus M/s. Atmel R&D India Private Ltd. and Vica-Versa
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11416 (ITAT-CHENNAI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=51799&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - Assessee couldn’t pursue the case before the Tribunal due to non-receipt of the appellate order, therefore inordinate delay of 2255 days in appeal filed by assessee in the interest of justice.
Selvi J. Jayalalithaa vs. ACIT
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11403 (ITAT-CHENNAI)
-
ITAT - If the money was borrowed for purchase of shares of subsidiary company for the purpose of acquiring controlling interest and acquisition of such controlling interest was of the business of the assessee and it resulted in promote the business of the assessee as well as helpful to the assessee for having management control over said such subsidiary company, then the interest expenditure should be allowed u/s.36(1)(iii).
M/s. Aban Offshore Ltd. Versus The Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Corporate Circle – 1 (1), Chennai and Vica-Versa
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11370 (ITAT-CHENNAI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=51793&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - Interest u/s.234C should be charged on Return of income filed in compliance to notice Sec. 148 of the Act as the chargeability provisions are not applicable only to the Return of income filed u/s.139(1).
Sree Meenakshi Reltors Versus The Income Tax Officer, Ward II (3), Coimbatore
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11255 (ITAT-CHENNAI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=51611&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - Assessee with the malafide intention, after a period of three years, changed the consideration which cannot be appreciated, therefore the consideration shown in the original sale deed has to be considered for determination of the capital gain (slump sale).
The Income Tax Officer, Corporate Ward 2 (1), Chennai Versus M/s Eagle Apparels LLP
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11252 (ITAT-CHENNAI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=51614&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - Amount received on transfer of software undertaking by assessee-company to Indian branch of its AE is taxable as slump sale u/s 50B and not as business non compete fees u/s 28(va).
Sella Synergy India Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11184 (ITAT-CHENNAI)
-
ITAT - Gain due to foreign exchange fluctuation is capital in nature since the transaction was relatable to acquisition of capital asset.
M/s Renault India Pvt. Ltd. Versus The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11175 (ITAT-CHENNAI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=50882&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - Purchase of tiles for construction of new floor on the leased asset of the company. Allowable as revenue expenditure u/s 37(1).
M/s. Rialto Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Versus The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Corporate Range 5, Chennai
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11161 (ITAT-CHENNAI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=51411&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - Embezzled cash by an employee of the assessee in the course of business activity is business loss.
M/s Saravana Selvarathnam Trading and Manufacturing P. Ltd Versus The Asstt. Commissioner of Income-tax, Central Circle IV (2) , Chennai and The Dy. Commissioner of Income-taxCentral Circle 1 (2), Chennai
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11159 (ITAT-CHENNAI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=51413&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - No TDS on payment of bareboat hire charges in view of Protocol 7 of India-France DTAA.
International Seaport Dredging Ltd. vs. DCIT
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11087 (ITAT-CHENNAI)
-
ITAT - The assessee company had directly absorbed the profit derived from the sale of its capital asset in the balance sheet thereby avoided to disclose the same in its profit and loss account in order to escape from the clutches of the provisions of section 115JB.
M/s. PVP Corporate Parks Pvt. Ltd Versus The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Corporate Circle-5 (2), Chennai
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11067 (ITAT-CHENNAI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=51209&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - The fact remains that the property was settled by way of family arrangement for convenient enjoyment and the property remains with assessee’s son and daughter. Therefore, the exemption u/s 54F/54 cannot be denied.
Smt. Rukmani Santhanam Versus The Income Tax Officer, Business ward IV (4), Chennai
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10944 (ITAT-CHENNAI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=50987&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.