-
ITAT - Providing medical, maternity, nursery, fertility and vaccination facilities to bovine milch animals belonging to milk producers in lieu of collecting cess @ 12 paisa per liter of the milk produced cannot be called a trade, commerce or business. Exemption claim was wrongly denied by invoking section 2(15) proviso.
Amul Research and Development Association, C/o Amul Dairy Premises Versus The ITO, Ward-3, Income Tax Office, Anand
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11135 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=51392&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - Sale of shares whether genuine, which was substantiated by bogus documents? Whether addition u/s 69 or u/s 68?
ACIT, Circle-6, Ahmedabad Versus Smt. Jaya Vineet Agarwal
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11121 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=51337&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - Since assessee has maintained that books of accounts are required u/s 44AA(2) but had not got the accounts audited as required u/s 44AB particularly when loss was claimed on the gross receipts, reopening the assessment confirmed.
Artech Technocrate Pvt. Ltd. Versus The ITO Ward-1 (3), Ahmedabad
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11119 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=51197&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - The paramount consideration of section 40A(3) is to curb and reduce the possibilities of black money transactions and section does not eliminate considerations of business expediencies. Cash payments made to Electricity Company for the supply of Electricity not attracted u/s.40(A)(3).
M/s. Shiv Krupa Tin Containers Versus The ITO, SK Ward-1, Himatnagar
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11055 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=50988&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - In absence of any case made out by the A.O. to show that Section 115A and Section 9(1)(vii) are not applicable in the present case, therefore the income of the assessee with regard to PDPL project is liable to tax @ 10% as has been claimed by the assessee.
Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, (International Taxation) -I, Ahmedabad Versus Joint Stock Company Zangas
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10980 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=51051&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - Amount received by a US individual for rendering software development services to an Indian entity is not taxable under Article 15 (Independent personal services) of India-US DTAA.
ITO(IT). vs. Susanto Purnamo
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10859 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
-
ITAT - Assessee’s treatment of declaring short term capital gains based on earlier ‘unregistered’ agreement to sale entered with vendee justified. General-law applies over TOPA. Addition deleted.
Sapnaben Dipakbhai Patel Vs. ITO
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10684 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
-
ITAT - Expenditure on issue of convertible debenture directly related to the expansion of capital base of the companyis to be treated as capital expenditure.
Gruh Finance Ltd. Versus ACIT, Cir. 4 Ahmedabad
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10664 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=50256&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - Taxable income arising on account of revaluation, adjustment could be made to the profit and loss account for the purpose of “book profits” u/s 115JB.
Infibeam Incorporation Ltd. Versus The ITO Ward-4 (3), Ahmedabad
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10659 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=50229&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - Merely because additions have been confirmed in appeal or no appeal has been filed by assessee, it cannot be the sole ground for penalty u/s.271(1)(c).
The ACIT, Circle-1 (4), Ahmedabad Versus Shri Bhaubha Devisinh and Vice-Versa
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10619 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=49896&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - Debit balance in profit and loss account can't be taken at nil under Explanation 1 (iii) to Sec. 115JB. Unabsorbed depreciation reduction allowed.
Surat Textile Mills Ltd. Vs. DCIT
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10319 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD) · Section. 115JB
-
ITAT - When the principal transaction i.e. compensation itself was not taxable, the subsidiary transaction i.e. interest for delay in paying such compensation is also not taxable.
Urvi Chirag Sheth vs. ITO
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10294 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD) · Sections. 56(2), 145A
-
ITAT - Provision of Sec. 43B overrides the method of accounting consistently followed and provides for the deduction of statutory liabilities in the year of payment irrespective of the year in which the liability is incurred.
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Versus Gujarat Borosil Limited
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10289 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=49302&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - The payment is made in respect of foreign travel of the specified persons but that does not bring the expense within the scope of disallowance under section 40A(2).
Ideal Sheet Metal Stamping and Pressing Pvt. Ltd. Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-4, Ahmedabad and Vica-Versa
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10276 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=47464&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - Deeming provisions of Sec. 50C not applicable to transfer of rights in land as the same cannot be equated to land or building or both.
Smt. Devindraben I. Barot Vs. Income Tax Officer
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10191 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD) · Section. 50C
-
ITAT - Payments for 3D Seismic Data Interpretation services is not FTS under Article 13 of India- UK DTAA. Services do not “make available” technical expertise. No TDS u/s 195.
Adani Welspun Exploration Ltd. vs. I.T.O
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10182 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
-
ITAT - Income earned from slot chartering in certain vessels sailing from Port of India is not taxable in India under Article 8 of India-Indonesia DTAA.
K Cargo Global Agencies, Indonesia vs. ITO
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10161 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
-
ITAT - Revenue couldn’t unearth any evidence/tangible material against the assessee, either during the course of assessment/ appellate proceedings to show that assessee made any unexplained/undisclosed payment.
Mahendrabhai B. Shrivastav vs. ITO
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10106 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
-
An order of revision passed on a non-existing entity, even though the power of attorney and the adjournment and the reply to show cause notice was signed by the erstwhile company, is invalid. The Tribunal held that the case of estoppel relied on by the department cannot be applied to instant case as assessee did not behave in a notorious way to mislead the department. Taking cognizance of the intimation filed by the assessee to the jurisdictional AO that the company is not is existence, during the assessment proceedings, of the intervening assessment years, and there being no provision in law to intimate the CIT regarding the facts of merger, the ITAT held the order to be invalid.
Milestone Tradelinks P.Ltd vs. ITO
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10044 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
-
ITAT (SB) - Transfer of carbon credits is a taxable receipt. Dissent from Hyderabad bench ruling in My Home Power case.
Kalpataru Power Transmission Ltd. vs. DCIT
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10024 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.