-
HC - Madras High Court Clarifies 'Flavoured Milk' GST Classification, Limits GST Council's Role in Determining Tax Categories.
M/s.Parle Agro Pvt. Ltd. vs .Union of India & Ors.
(2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 8282 (HC-MADRAS)
-
HC - Madras HC Supports Indiabulls, Rejects TDS Transfer Denial from VAT to GST.
Indiabulls Construction Ltd. vs. The Assistant Commissioner (ST) & Anr.
(2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 8218 (HC-MADRAS)
-
HC - Madras HC Addresses GSTN Portal Discrepancy; Ensures Fair Play for Assessees.
East Coast Constructions and Industries Ltd vs Assistant Commissioner (ST)
(2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 8149 (HC-MADRAS)
-
HC - Madras HC Deems 'Business Woes' and 'Employee Exit' as Justifiable Causes for Appeal Delays.
SRM Engineering Construction Corporation Ltd vs The Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC).
(2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 8130 (HC-MADRAS)
-
HC - Madras High Court Extends Amnesty Scheme Benefits and Allows GST Registration Restoration Despite Past Cut-off Date.
Active Pest Control vs. The Deputy Commissioner & Anr.
(2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 8034 (HC-MADRAS)
-
HC - Madras HC Allows Debit from ECrL for Pre-Deposit in Appeals, Orders Revenue to Number Appeal.
Larsen & Toubro Ltd. vs. The Joint Commissioner (ST) & Anr.
(2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 8009 (HC-MADRAS)
-
HC - Madras HC Rules on Jurisdiction for Audit of Closed Business.
Tvl.Raja Stores vs The Assistant Commissioner (ST)
(2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7982 (HC-MADRAS)
-
HC - Madras HC Rules on Credit Note Requirement for Returned Goods and Detention. A credit note is not required to be issued when the goods were being returned without even being received by the recipient.
Luminous Power Technologies Pvt Ltd. Vs State Tax Officer
(2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7974 (HC-MADRAS)
-
HC - Madras HC on Interest Levy for Delayed Tax Payment.
Srinivasa Stampings vs UOI
(2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7940 (HC-MADRAS)
-
HC - Striking a Balance: HC's Verdict on Adjournment and Tax Liability in Voluminous Transaction Case.
Vadivelu Pyro Works vs. The State Tax Officer
(2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7907 (HC-MADRAS)
-
HC - Madras HC Dismisses Writ Petition Against ITC Reversal on Machinery Purchase Due to Supplier's Cancelled Registration. here cannot be a mandamus contrary to the provisions of theGST Act and the Rules.
Jai Balaji Paper Cones vs. The Assistant Commissioner
(2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7852 (HC-MADRAS)
-
Order of assessment shall be treated as a show cause notice by the petitioner.
Hatsun Agro Product Ltd. vs. The Deputy Commissioner (ST) & Ors.
(2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7711 (HC-MADRAS)
-
It was incumbent upon the officer to fix the matter for hearing, heard the petitioners and thereafter determined the tax payable.
Sri Krishna Timbers & Ors. vs. State Tax Officer
(2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7674 (HC-MADRAS)
-
It was for assessee to have responded to the notices and furnish the break-up of the ITC claimed under GSTR 3B as sought by the officer and attempted to reconcile its claim of ITC in the GSTR 3B return with the ITC reflected in GSTR 2A and GSTR 9.
Seoyon E-Hwa Summit Automotive India Pvt. Ltd. vs. The Deputy Commissioner
(2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7654 (HC-MADRAS)
-
Revenue is directed to take up order passed on the application made by the assessee under Section 129(6) on emergent basis for disposal expeditiously.
Thiruchy Royal Steels vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer
(2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7598 (HC-MADRAS)
-
Reasonable opportunity ought to be given to a person to show cause and depending upon the facts of each case, further extension of time can be granted by the Assessing Officer.
Exide Industries Ltd vs. The Deputy Commissioner
(2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7587 (HC-MADRAS)
-
It is not for the transporter to make a submission for seeking release of conveyance on the ground that tax has been paid in full, as such payment, if at all, would have been borne by the assessee concerned, and not the transporter.
Lodha Roadways vs. Deputy State Tax Officer
(2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7568 (HC-MADRAS)
-
The mere fact that an order has been passed under Rule 86A(2) of TNGST Rules for unblocking of credit will not stand in the way of the assessing officer making an assessment or curtail his powers in any way, in such an exercise.
D. Ranganathan vs. The Assistant Commissioner & Ors.
(2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7538 (HC-MADRAS)
-
The very purpose of fixing the mandatory pre-deposit is to do away with the procedure of granting stay after hearing, which was delaying the disposal of the appeal earlier.
Mahalaxmi Metal Co. vs. the Assistant Commissioner (ST) & Ors.
(2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7529 (HC-MADRAS)
-
If at all the assessing officer is unsatisfied with the attribution adopted by assessee, he is always at liberty to seek more particulars or apply the deeming fiction as per the Notification.
Avigna Properties Pvt. Ltd. Vs State Tax Officer
(2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7514 (HC-MADRAS)
Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.