Search
Advanced Search Search with field filters
/adv
Navigation
Home Go to homepage
/home
Direct Tax Income Tax resources
GST GST Acts, Rules & Case Laws
Company Law Companies Act & SEBI
Due Date Tracker Statutory compliance deadlines
/due
Due Date Calendar Calendar view of compliance deadlines
Daily Digest Today's tax updates and articles
/digest
Landmark Rulings

Karnataka High Court — GST

204 rulings

  1. Karnataka High Court · 03 Nov 2022
    Merely because that the petitioner has an option of seeking revocation under Section 30 it cannot be said that independent of the said remedy of seeking revocation an appeal would not be maintainable.

    Shailaja Chandrashekar vs Addl. Commissioner of Central Tax (A)

    (2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 6850 (HC-KARNATAKA)

  2. Karnataka High Court · 27 Sep 2022
    Revenue is directed to pay the assessee, the sale proceeds of the auction after deducting the penalty prescribed under Section 129(1)(a).

    Rajeev Traders vs. UOI & Ors.

    (2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 6726 (HC-KARNATAKA)

  3. Karnataka High Court · 26 Sep 2022
    Impugned legislative action that has clamped an absolute embargo on all games of skill defies the principle of proportionality and is far excessive in nature and therefore violates Article 14 of the Constitution on the ground of manifest arbitrariness.

    All India Gaming Federation & ors vs State of Karnataka & ors

    (2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 6723 (HC-KARNATAKA)

  4. Karnataka High Court · 13 Sep 2022
    Revenue is directed to restore the GST registration as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of 4 weeks.

    Deepak Vasude Asrani Chugh HUF vs. Joint Commissioner of GST & Anr.

    (2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 6672 (HC-KARNATAKA)

  5. Karnataka High Court · 16 Aug 2022
    Restoration of registration will not mean the cessation of statutory liabilities of the petitioner following cancellation of registration, non-filing of returns and non-payment of tax.

    Shri. Pandarakandiyil Moideenkutty vs Superintendent of Central Tax and Central Excise

    (2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 6594 (HC-KARNATAKA)

  6. Karnataka High Court · 20 Jul 2022
    Circular cannot have the effect of overruling the notification.

    DPJ Bidar-Chincholi (Annuity) Road Project Pvt. Ltd. vs UOI

    (2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 6501 (HC-KARNATAKA)

  7. Karnataka High Court · 07 Apr 2021
    There’s no reason to interfere with the order passed by the AAAR as the appeal itself was preferred beyond the expiry of limitation period.

    N.M.D.C. Admin Building vs. The Authority for Advance Ruling

    (2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 6391 (HC-KARNATAKA)

  8. Karnataka High Court · 27 May 2022
    The items in entries 4907-00, 4907-00-10 have a recognized face value. But, the Pattadar Pass Book does not have a face value. Even it does not have fiduciary or intrinsic value. It is a mere pass book printed with blank columns to be filled up by the revenue authorities.

    Manipal Technologies Ltd. Vs State of Karnataka

    (2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 6282 (HC-KARNATAKA)

  9. Karnataka High Court · 26 Apr 2022
    Article 246-A neither overrides nor restricts the operation of Article 246 read with Entry 84 of List I of Schedule VII.

    V.S. Products vs. UOI

    (2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 6146 (HC-KARNATAKA)

  10. Karnataka High Court · 08 Mar 2022
    There is no delay or laches in filing the writ petition and the claim for refund filed by assessee is well within time.

    UOI vs. Bundl Technologies Pvt. Ltd.

    (2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 5969 (HC-KARNATAKA)

  11. Karnataka High Court · 15 Feb 2022
    Benefit of exemption notification cannot be denied to the petitioner on the ground that the lessee is not using the premises.

    Taghar Vasudeva Ambrish vs. AAAR

    (2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 5881 (HC-KARNATAKA)

  12. Karnataka High Court · 03 Feb 2022
    The moratorium provision contained in Sec. 14 of the IBC would include proceedings u/s 138 of the NI Act also and by token of the same reasoning, proceedings initiated by Respondent under the GST Act would also attract the bar contained in Sec. 14.

    In the matter of Associate Décor Ltd. vs. Dy. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes.

    (2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 5845 (HC-KARNATAKA) · Section 14

  13. Karnataka High Court · 29 Apr 2021
    Assessee is directed to appear before the investigating officer within 3 weeks and cooperate with invetsigation.

    Abdul Shaji vs. The Commr. Of Central Tax and Central Excise

    (2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 5833 (HC-KARNATAKA)

  14. Karnataka High Court · 07 May 2021
    Given the scheme of the Act prescribing definite timelines for preferring an appeal and the lapse of right of appeal thereafter, the Appellate Authority would have to consider the circumstances asserted and would also have to decide on the merits of the matter.

    P. Venu Gopal Reddy vs. The Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes & Ors.

    (2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 5724 (HC-KARNATAKA)

  15. Karnataka High Court · 28 Dec 2021
    Denial of refunds on hyper technicalities, will be a blot on the statutory intent.

    Dantara Jewellers vs. The State of Kerala & Ors.

    (2021) TaxCorp(IDT) 5683 (HC-KARNATAKA)

  16. Karnataka High Court · 08 Jun 2021
    Unless and until this liability is satisfied, such an interim order should not have been granted in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case.

    UOI vs. Aditya Auto Engineering Pvt Ltd

    (2021) TaxCorp(IDT) 5552 (HC-KARNATAKA)

  17. Karnataka High Court · 08 Jun 2021
    Blocking of electronic credit ledger cannot be extended beyond the period of 1 year from the date of imposing such restriction.

    Aryan Tradelink Vs UOI

    (2021) TaxCorp(IDT) 5550 (HC-KARNATAKA)

  18. Karnataka High Court · 26 Mar 2021
    Liberty is being granted to Revenue to verify genuineness of Assessee's claim.

    Shriprop Projects Pvt Ltd & Ors vs. UOI & Ors.

    (2021) TaxCorp(IDT) 4777 (HC-KARNATAKA)

  19. Karnataka High Court · 23 Mar 2021
    After the insertion of sub-rule (1A) to Rule 117, the sub- rule was amended not once, but thrice so as to extend the time from March 31, 2019 to March 31, 2020 and ultimately, it was extended to August 31, 2020.

    UOI vs. Asaid Paints Limited

    (2021) TaxCorp(IDT) 4767 (HC-KARNATAKA)

  20. Karnataka High Court · 02 Mar 2021
    Composition is completely contrary to several Constitution Bench decisions of SC as said provisions envisage appointment of only Technical members as members of the coram of said authorities.

    NCS Pearson Inc. v. Union of India & Ors.

    (2021) TaxCorp(IDT) 4701 (HC-KARNATAKA)

Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload ×

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.