-
The interest amount as well as the penalty proceedings and further investigation with regard to other outlets are stayed till further orders.
Lite Bite Travels Foods Pvt. Ltd. vs. UOI & Ors.
(2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4402 (HC-DELHI)
-
Revenue vide 2 letters had held the refund of the Assessee on booking a case of fraudulent availment or passing of ITC against the Assessee and granted personal hearing opportunity u/s 54(11) of the CGST Act.
S.H. Exports vs. Commissioner of CGST & Anr.
(2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4395 (HC-DELHI)
-
Grievance of the Petitioner no longer survives in accordance with the Administrative Instruction dated 18th September, 2020 issued by the Ministry of Finance through the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs.
Pranika Commercial and Estates Pvt. Ltd. vs. UOI &Ors.
(2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4393 (HC-DELHI)
-
Judicial interference at this threshold stage of investigation has to be exercised with circumspection.
P.V. Rao vs. Senior Intelligence Officer, DGGSTI
(2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4392 (HC-DELHI)
-
In spite of grant of stay of further investigation by this Court, Revenue has precipitated the issue.
Gaursons Realtech Pvt Ltd vs. Union of India & Ors
(2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4336 (HC-DELHI)
-
While this Court had asked the counsel for the parties to frame issues only to ensure that concise and precise arguments are advanced if a large number of issues are framed, it would only protract and delay the hearing.
Macrotech Developers Ltd. vs UOI
(2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4318 (HC-DELHI)
-
Till the State Consumer Welfare Funds become operational and necessary details of the State CWFs are made available to the petitioner, the petitioner is directed to deposit the entire amount with the Centre Consumer Welfare Funds.
Samsonite South Asia Pvt. Ltd. vs. UOI
(2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4317 (HC-DELHI)
-
Post the issuance of the impugned Order, the GST authorities visited its plant, and insisted on payment of the amount at the earliest, failing which they would attach the Petitioner’s property.
Litecon Industries Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India & Ors.
(2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4310 (HC-DELHI)
-
Parties are directed to file affidavits.
Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India & Ors.
(2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4267 (HC-DELHI)
-
The replies and representations filed by Assessee shall not be rejected/dismissed on the ground of limitation.
Gulshan Kapoor vs. Commissioner of Delhi Goods & Services Tax & Ors.
(2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4256 (HC-DELHI)
-
Rule 90(3) is ultra vires Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India or alternatively Rule 90(3) to be read down to the effect that rectification of deficiencies shall not be treated as submission of fresh application for the purpose of computing limitation for applying refund & grant of interest on delayed refund.
Insitel Services Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India & Ors.
(2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4217 (HC-DELHI)
-
Petitioner had already passed on the benefit amounting to Rs.30,57,775/- to the flat buyers and the balance amount was deposited in the bank account specifically opened for the said purpose and the cheques and credit notes for the entire profiteered amount were drawn but have remained uncleared.
Ramprastha Promoters and Developers Pvt Ltd vs. Union of India & Ors.
(2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4216 (HC-DELHI)
-
As there is an alternative remedy of appeal available to the Assessee therefore, restrains to entertain the prayer, while grants liberty to the Assessee to appeal before the appropriate forum.
M/s Krishna International vs. Commissioner, Delhi GST
(2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4211 (HC-DELHI)
-
Respondent to is directed file a counter-affidavit within four weeks.
Dish TV India Limited vs Union of India
(2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4182 (HC-DELHI)
-
Notice is issued to the Revenue for examining the legality and validity of section 17(5)(d) and the Explanation to Section 17.
Bharti Airtel Limited vs. Union of India & Ors.
(2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4140 (HC-DELHI) · Section 17
-
Mr. V. Lakshmikumaran, learned counsel, shall be the point person/coordinator for the petitioners and Mr. Zoheb Hussain, learned counsel shall represent the respondents and accordingly, they are directed to prepare a convenience compilation.
Pyramid Infratech Pvt. Ltd. & Ots. vs. UOI & Ors .
(2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4128 (HC-DELHI)
-
Assessee is directed to deposit the principal profiteered amount i.e. Rs.19,81,035/- in six equated monthly instalments commencing 01st September, 2020.
Cilantro Diners Pvt. Ltd. vs. UOI & Ors.
(2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4111 (HC-DELHI)
-
It would be for the CIC to go into the minutes of the Board Meetings and of the AGMs and to determine as to which of the information which is contained in the minutes attracts the provision of Section 8(1)(d) of the Act, namely, are exempt from disclosure and which portion of the minutes can be given to respondent No. 2 in response to his application under the RTI Act.
GSTN vs. Information Commissioner, CIC & Anr.
(2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4110 (HC-DELHI)
-
Unless the decision can be shown to be manifestly unreasonable or arbitrary, this Court will be extremely slow in interfering with the policy decision of the Government.
Gaurav Yadav & Anr. vs. UOI & Ors.
(2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4086 (HC-DELHI)
-
HC - Notice to Revenue in respect of rejection of refund application in respect of assessee’s contention that the liability to pay interest u/s 50 of the CGST Act should be confined only to the net tax liability.
Parnika Commercial and Estates Private Limited vs. Union of India & Ors.
(2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4065 (HC-DELHI)
Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.