Search
Advanced Search Search with field filters
/adv
Navigation
Home Go to homepage
/home
Direct Tax Income Tax resources
GST GST Acts, Rules & Case Laws
Company Law Companies Act & SEBI
Due Date Tracker Statutory compliance deadlines
/due
Due Date Calendar Calendar view of compliance deadlines
Daily Digest Today's tax updates and articles
/digest
Landmark Rulings

Delhi High Court — Direct Tax

1,066 rulings

  1. Delhi High Court · 07 Mar 2015
    HC - Expenditure on advertisement by assessee, engaged in service of trading of mobile handsets and its accessories are allowable as revenue expenditure as every year expenditure has to be incurred to make and keep public informed, aware and remain in limelight

    Commissioner of Income-tax-III v. Spice Distribution Ltd.

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 5628 (HC-DELHI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=58251&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  2. Delhi High Court · 04 Mar 2015
    HC - By no stretch of imagination can Section 14A or Rule 8D be interpreted so as to mean that the entire tax exempt income is to be disallowed. Disallowance worked out by AO at about 110% of the entire tax exempt income, not justified.

    Joint Investments Pvt Ltd. vs. CIT

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 5613 (HC-DELHI) · Section. 14A

  3. Delhi High Court · 03 Mar 2015
    HC - All business profits of the undertaking are eligible for deduction and it is not necessary to show that they have a "direct nexus" with the undertaking

    CIT vs. Hritnik Exports Pvt. Ltd

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 5596 (HC-DELHI) · Section 10B(4)

  4. Delhi High Court · 03 Mar 2015
    HC - There cannot be a general rule that whenever a refund of income tax paid in excess is to be made, the Revenue must necessarily pay interest on the refunded amount

    CIT vs. Engineers India Ltd

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 5576 (HC-DELHI)

  5. Delhi High Court · 27 Feb 2015
    HC - Issue relating to promotion of ACIT, petitioners were required to approach Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) in first instance. Writ petition not maintainable

    Sanjay Pandey v. Central Board of Direct Taxes

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 5537 (HC-DELHI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=58671&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  6. Delhi High Court · 25 Feb 2015
    HC - Section 201 proceedings initiated after four years against assessee is not justified. Also, Parliament decided against retro amendment to section 201.

    CIT vs. C. J. International Hotels Pvt. Ltd

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 5532 (HC-DELHI) · Section 201

  7. Delhi High Court · 24 Feb 2015
    HC - Registering of ‘criminal contempt’ is directed against the intervener for alleging collusion between taxpayers and Government Department.

    CIT vs. Escorts Ltd

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 5512 (HC-DELHI)

  8. Delhi High Court · 24 Feb 2015
    HC - Persons to whom interest was paid on cash loan, their details and particulars were not ascertained, verified and examined by AO, therefore addition u/s 69C as well as penalty u/s 269T is not justified.

    Commissioner of Income-tax (Central) II v. Home Developers (P.) Ltd.

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 5502 (HC-DELHI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=59118&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  9. Delhi High Court · 21 Feb 2015
    HC - Contribution towards the transfer fees and non occupancy charges are covered by the principle of mutuality and is not chargeable to tax

    Commissioner of Income Tax-16 Versus Shyam Co-Op. Housing Society Ltd.

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 5473 (HC-DELHI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=60452&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  10. Delhi High Court · 19 Feb 2015
    HC - When voluntary disallowance made by assessee under section 14A is found to be unsatisfactory on examination of accounts, only then AO can invoke rule 8D to compute deduction.

    Commissioner of Income-tax- VI v. Taikisha Engineering India Ltd.

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 5407 (HC-DELHI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=58850&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  11. Delhi High Court · 16 Feb 2015
    HC - Reserve created under Section 45-IC of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 can neither be diversion of income at source nor constitute an expenditure or liability

    SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ACIT

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 5403 (HC-DELHI) · Section 115JB

  12. Delhi High Court · 16 Feb 2015
    HC - The revenue did not discharge the burden of proving due service of notice u/s 143(2), therefore the notice issued after the period of limitation could not be held against the assessee.

    MOHAN S LAKHANI Versus INCOME TAX OFFICER & ANR

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 5399 (HC-DELHI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=60399&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  13. Delhi High Court · 16 Feb 2015
    HC - Statutory reserve created u/s 45-IC of RBI Act is not a "diversion of income at source" and cannot be excluded from book profits

    Srei Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ACIT

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 5395 (HC-DELHI) · Section 115JB

  14. Delhi High Court · 16 Feb 2015
    HC - AO had adopted GP rate of 25% on ad hoc basis for civil contractor. ITAT was justified in adopting presumptive tax rate of 8 per cent as mentioned in section 44AD even though turnover of assessee was in excess of Rs. 40 lakh.

    Commissioner of Income-tax-XIII v. Lovish Oberoi

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 5392 (HC-DELHI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=57871&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  15. Delhi High Court · 13 Feb 2015
    HC - Deduction u/s 80I is available on the gross income without reducing Sec 80HH deduction

    Commissioner Of Income Tax Del-Iii Vs. Unipatch Rubber Ltd.

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 5372 (HC-DELHI) · Section. 80HH

  16. Delhi High Court · 13 Feb 2015
    HC - Royalty u/s 9(1)(vi) - Lump-sum payments are covered under the term ‘royalty’. The agreement postulated grant of permission to use or right to use intellectual property rights or know how and it is not a case of outright sale

    HCL LIMITED Versus THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX NEW DELHI

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 5358 (HC-DELHI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenINTL.aspx?ID=7865&Category=INTLDecisions&CategoryType=Zip

  17. Delhi High Court · 11 Feb 2015
    AAR - Assessee which is a project engineering company, is entitled to exemption u/s 10B on plant installation project executed outside India.

    CIT vs AAR ESS EXIM Pvt Ltd

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 5332 (HC-DELHI) · Section 10B

  18. Delhi High Court · 11 Feb 2015
    HC - Lumpsum payment by assessee to a foreign company under the “Technology Transfer and Technical Assistance Agreement” for 5 yrs., is “Royalty" as rights not fully alienated

    HCL Limited vs. The CIT

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 5331 (HC-DELHI)

  19. Delhi High Court · 11 Feb 2015
    HC - One of the functions to be performed by the assessee was to incur the advertisement and promotion expenditure, then the expenditure incurred for the said purpose should be allowed under section 37(1) as incurred wholly and exclusively.

    COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus DISCOVERY COMMUNICATION INDIA

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 5325 (HC-DELHI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=59095&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  20. Delhi High Court · 09 Feb 2015
    HC - Sec 269SS not attracted for advances given by partners to the partnership firm as not distinct entities; No Sec 271D penalty.

    CIT. vs. Muthoot Financiers

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 5289 (HC-DELHI) · Sections. 269-SS, 271D

Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload ×

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.