Search
Advanced Search Search with field filters
/adv
Navigation
Home Go to homepage
/home
Direct Tax Income Tax resources
GST GST Acts, Rules & Case Laws
Company Law Companies Act & SEBI
Due Date Tracker Statutory compliance deadlines
/due
Due Date Calendar Calendar view of compliance deadlines
Daily Digest Today's tax updates and articles
/digest
Landmark Rulings

Delhi High Court — Direct Tax

1,066 rulings

  1. Delhi High Court · 23 Oct 2015
    HC - Interest on FDR kept as margin with bank qualifies for deduction u/s 10B.

    Universal Precision Screws vs. Pr. CIT

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 9224 (HC-DELHI)

  2. Delhi High Court · 21 Oct 2015
    Making allegations of fraud against Dept’s Counsel and claiming that they deliberately presented weak case seeks to prejudice and interfere with due course of judicial proceedings & prima facie constitutes criminal contempt of court

    CIT. vs. Escorts Limited

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 9221 (HC-DELHI)

  3. Delhi High Court · 21 Oct 2015
    HC - 0.5% of average tax free investment is required to be considered for sec. 14A disallowance and not total investment.

    ACB India Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 9213 (HC-DELHI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=60790&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  4. Delhi High Court · 19 Oct 2015
    S. 263: Claim that notional interest on funds placed by the s. 10A eligible unit with the H.O. is allowable as a deduction to the H.O. and is exempt in the hands of the s. 10A unit is an “unsustainable view” justifying revision action

    Thomson Press (India) Ltd. vs. CIT

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 9192 (HC-DELHI) · Section. 263

  5. Delhi High Court · 19 Oct 2015
    S. 147: Reopening only on the basis of information received that the assessee has introduced unaccounted money in the form of accommodation entries without showing in what manner the AO applied independent mind to the information renders the reopening void

    Pr. CIT. vs. G & G Pharma India Ltd.

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 9191 (HC-DELHI)

  6. Delhi High Court · 15 Oct 2015
    HC - Reopening assessment on the basis of a judicial precedent (SC ruling) delivered more than eight years earlier is merely a 'change of opinion'. Reassessment not valid.

    Coperion Ideal Private Limited vs. CIT

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 9168 (HC-DELHI)

  7. Delhi High Court · 13 Oct 2015
    S. 147: Laid laid down in ALA Firm v. CIT 189 ITR 285 (SC) does not mean that an assessment can be reopened merely because the AO omitted to apply a binding judgement

    Coperdion Ideal Private Limited vs. CIT

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 9162 (HC-DELHI) · Section 147

  8. Delhi High Court · 14 Oct 2015
    HC - Sec 10A exemption available even on the basis of revised computation of income filed by assessee during assessment proceedings.

    CIT. vs. E-Funds International India Pvt Ltd.

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 9149 (HC-DELHI)

  9. Delhi High Court · 12 Oct 2015
    S. 10A/ 80HHE: Claiming deduction u/s 80HHE for one year does not debar the assessee from claiming deduction u/s 10A for another year. Fact that claim is not made via a revised return is no bar on the right of the appellate authority to consider it

    Pr. CIT vs. E-Funds International India Pvt Ltd

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 9119 (HC-DELHI) · Section 10A, 80HHE

  10. Delhi High Court · 10 Oct 2015
    HC - Assessee (an educational institution)was under a bonafide belief that it was not required to file return u/s 139(1) as its entire income was exempt u/s 10(22)/10(23C). Therefore, surplus disclosed in its books of account cannot be considered as ‘undisclosed income’.

    DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION) Vs. ALL INDIA PERSONALITY ENHANCEMENT

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 9109 (HC-DELHI)

  11. Delhi High Court · 09 Oct 2015
    HC - Figures in the accounts cannot be altered though by way of “regrouping”, once the audited balance sheet was signed by directors/auditors and submitted to statutory authorities including ROC.

    CIT. vs Morgan securities & Credits Pvt Ltd.

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 9107 (HC-DELHI)

  12. Delhi High Court · 09 Oct 2015
    HC - AS-29 makes it explicit that no provision for a contingent liability can be recognized. Expense provision made without scientific basis disallowed.

    Seagram Distilleries Pvt Ltd. vs. CIT

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 9104 (HC-DELHI)

  13. Delhi High Court · 08 Oct 2015
    S. 14A/ Rule 8D cannot be automatically invoked. It cannot be invoked if the AO does not record satisfaction as to why the assessee’s voluntary disallowance is not proper

    CIT. vs. I. P. Support Services India (P) Ltd.

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 9071 (HC-DELHI) · Section. 14A

  14. Delhi High Court · 07 Oct 2015
    HC - Invocation of 14A is not automatic and does not come into operation as soon as the dividend income is claimed exempt.

    CIT. vs. LP support services India(P) Ltd.

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 9069 (HC-DELHI)

  15. Delhi High Court · 01 Oct 2015
    HC - Service tax collected by the assessee cannot form part of gross receipts for the purpose of computing income u/s 44BB, since it does not have element of income.

    DIT. vs. Mitchell Drilling International Pvt. Ltd.

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 9014 (HC-DELHI) · Section. 44BB

  16. Delhi High Court · 01 Oct 2015
    HC - Netting off bank-interest expense allowed against interest income earned from advancing loan to holding company assessable under the head “income from other sources”. Tuticorin Alkali (SC) Distinguished.

    Vodafone South Limited vs. CIT

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 9013 (HC-DELHI)

  17. Delhi High Court · 28 Sep 2015
    HC - Lease of plant/machinery along-with land/building for 10 years period is not transfer u/s 2(47). No capital gains u/s 45 for AY 1994-95.

    Teletube Electronics Limited vs. CIT

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 8962 (HC-DELHI)

  18. Delhi High Court · 28 Sep 2015
    HC - To determine whether the “agricultural land” is situated within 8 km of the municipal limits so as to constitute a “capital asset”, the distance has to be measured in terms of the approach road and not by the straight line distance on horizontal plane or as per crow's flight (S. 2(14)(iii)(b))

    CIT vs. Vijay Singh Kadan

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 8953 (HC-DELHI) · Section 2(14)(iii)(b)

  19. Delhi High Court · 21 Sep 2015
    HC - Compensation received from prospective employer for non- commencement of employment, a capital receipt and not taxable

    CIT vs. Pritam Das Narang

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 8880 (HC-DELHI)

  20. Delhi High Court · 21 Sep 2015
    HC - Section 68 applicable even if assessee was taxable on presumptive basis and where he fails to explain source of deposits.

    Commissioner of Income-tax v. Chander Prakash Pabreja

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 8857 (HC-DELHI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=59326&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload ×

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.