Search
Advanced Search Search with field filters
/adv
Navigation
Home Go to homepage
/home
Direct Tax Income Tax resources
GST GST Acts, Rules & Case Laws
Company Law Companies Act & SEBI
Due Date Tracker Statutory compliance deadlines
/due
Due Date Calendar Calendar view of compliance deadlines
Daily Digest Today's tax updates and articles
/digest
Landmark Rulings

Calcutta High Court — GST

244 rulings

  1. Calcutta High Court · 20 Dec 2023
    Calcutta High Court Extends Appeal-Filing Period under GST, Invoking Limitation Act Principles

    S.K. Chakraborty & Sons vs. Union of India & Ors.

    (2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 8431 (HC-CALCUTTA)

  2. Calcutta High Court · 14 Dec 2023
    HC - Calcutta High Court Upholds ITC Reversal for Delayed GSTR-3B Filing, Dismisses Assessee’s Plea.

    BBA Infrastructure Ltd vs Senior Joint Commissioner of State Tax and others

    (2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 8404 (HC-CALCUTTA)

  3. Calcutta High Court · 06 Oct 2023
    HC - Calcutta HC Overturns Penalty for Minor Delay Post E-Way Bill Expiry; Emphasizes No Tax Evasion Intent.

    Ishaan Plastics vs. The Deputy Commissioner of State Tax

    (2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 8133 (HC-CALCUTTA)

  4. Calcutta High Court · 25 Sep 2023
    HC - Calcutta HC Nullifies Appellate Authority's Adjustment of Output Tax in Refund Claim, Sends Matter for Re-examination.

    Abinash Rai vs. The Assistant Commissioner of West Bengal State Tax and Ors.

    (2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 8080 (HC-CALCUTTA)

  5. Calcutta High Court · 07 Sep 2023
    HC - Calcutta High Court Upholds Show Cause Notice, Dismisses Writ Appeal for Being Vague.

    Geeta Ganesh Promoters Pvt. Ltd. vs. UOI & Ors.

    (2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 8017 (HC-CALCUTTA)

  6. Calcutta High Court · 06 Sep 2023
    HC - Allahabad High Court Rules in Favor of Mandatory Hearing Opportunity Before Passing Adverse GST Order.

    Bajrang Building Material vs. State of U.P. & Ors

    (2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 8012 (HC-CALCUTTA)

  7. Calcutta High Court · 24 Aug 2023
    HC - Calcutta HC Allows Writ Appeal, Stays GST Scrutiny Proceedings Due to Completed Audit by the Audit Department.

    Gopeshwar Iron and Steel Works Pvt. Ltd. vs. The Superintendent, CGST & CX

    (2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7956 (HC-CALCUTTA)

  8. Calcutta High Court · 23 Aug 2023
    HC - Calcutta HC Remands Refund Denial solely due to non-receipt of payment in convertible foreign currency; Issue to Adjudicating Authority.

    Bimal Jhunjhunwala vs The Assistant Commissioner, CGST & CX

    (2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7952 (HC-CALCUTTA)

  9. Calcutta High Court · 02 Aug 2023
    HC - Calcutta HC Quashes Recovery Action Against Service Recipient for GSTR-2A-GSTR-3B Mismatch in the absence of any investigation done at the end of the supplier whose invoices were not reflecting in GSTR-2A.

    Suncraft Energy Pvt. Ltd. vs. The Assistant Commissioner, State Tax

    (2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7866 (HC-CALCUTTA)

  10. Calcutta High Court · 02 Aug 2023
    HC - Calcutta HC Directs Filing of Statutory Appeal on goods imported by the Assessee and Restrains Coercive Action in Penalty Imposition Case

    Khadim India Ltd vs. Assistant Commissioner

    (2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7864 (HC-CALCUTTA)

  11. Calcutta High Court · 26 Jul 2023
    HC - Calcutta HC Rules Loan to Credit Card Holder is Loan Simpliciter, Not Credit Card Service and was not exigible to IGST.

    Ramesh Kumar Patodia vs City Bank N.A. and Ors.

    (2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7836 (HC-CALCUTTA)

  12. Calcutta High Court · 25 Jul 2023
    HC - Calcutta HC Quashes Order Imposing 200% Penalty on Detained Consignment; Directs recalculate the penalty.

    Usha Gupta vs. Assistant Commissioner of Revenue

    (2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7832 (HC-CALCUTTA)

  13. Calcutta High Court · 27 Jun 2023
    A communication is privileged if it is made to a legal advisor by a client after the commission of a crime and with a view to his defence but not so if made before the commission of the crime or wrong and for the purpose of being guided or assisted in furthering or committing it.

    Himangshu Kumar Ray vs State of West Bengal

    (2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7705 (HC-CALCUTTA)

  14. Calcutta High Court · 14 Jun 2023
    Without proper verification, it cannot be said that there was any failure on the part of the Assessee in compliance of any obligation required under the statute before entering into the transactions in question.

    Gargo Traders vs. The Joint Commissioner, Commercial Taxes (State Tax) & Ors

    (2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7651 (HC-CALCUTTA)

  15. Calcutta High Court · 06 Jun 2023
    The issue of applicability of explanation was not urged by the department when the appeal was heard and therefore, on such new ground the review application cannot be maintained.

    The Commissioner of CGST & CX vs Bisweswar Midhya & Ors.

    (2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7622 (HC-CALCUTTA) · Section 75(12)

  16. Calcutta High Court · 29 May 2023
    The condition imposed by the learned Single Bench directing deposit of 20% of the disputed tax is set aside.

    Jai Venktesh Concast Pvt Ltd vs. The Deputy Commissioner of State Tax

    (2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7589 (HC-CALCUTTA)

  17. Calcutta High Court · 26 May 2023
    Section 159(5) clearly gives adequate power to the Assessee to file objection for releasing the bank account or, in the instant case cash-credit facility, thus when there is efficacious relief in the statute itself, the Assessee should adopt such efficacious relief.

    J L Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner

    (2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7583 (HC-CALCUTTA)

  18. Calcutta High Court · 08 May 2023
    In the diary recovered by the Special Investigation Branch, it was noticed that the assessee had received much more advance than it was shown in the returns.

    Jalsa Resorts vs. State of U.P.

    (2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7507 (HC-CALCUTTA)

  19. Calcutta High Court · 08 May 2023
    One more opportunity can be granted to the assessee to produce proof to show that he is a registered government contractor.

    Mohammad Sikandar Ali vs Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Siliguri Charge And Ors.

    (2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7504 (HC-CALCUTTA)

  20. Calcutta High Court · 25 Apr 2023
    A registered person under the CGST Act, including recipient of service, clearly fall within definition of Applicant defined u/s 95(c) and hence, have locus standi to file an application before AAR.

    Anmol Industries Ltd & amr vs West Bengal Authority for Advance Ruling

    (2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7453 (HC-CALCUTTA)

Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload ×

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.