Search
Advanced Search Search with field filters
/adv
Navigation
Home Go to homepage
/home
Direct Tax Income Tax resources
GST GST Acts, Rules & Case Laws
Company Law Companies Act & SEBI
Due Date Tracker Statutory compliance deadlines
/due
Due Date Calendar Calendar view of compliance deadlines
Daily Digest Today's tax updates and articles
/digest
Landmark Rulings

Bombay High Court — Direct Tax

1,071 rulings

  1. Bombay High Court · 15 Jan 2016
    S. 268A: Though the low tax effect circular No. 21/2015 dated 10.12.2015 does not refer to references filed u/s 256(1), it has to be held to apply to references as well in view of the objective of the CBDT to focus only on large tax effect matters

    CIT vs. Sunny Sounds P. Ltd

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 9786 (HC-BOMBAY) · Section 268A

  2. Bombay High Court · 07 Jan 2016
    HC - Non inclusion of others in the exclusionary Section 95(iii) of the KVSS 1998 will not render the classification done by the parliament as arbitrary or violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

    Amit Hemendra Jhaveri vs. Union of India, CIT

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 9758 (HC-BOMBAY)

  3. Bombay High Court · 29 Dec 2015
    HC - The Tribunal has power to extend the stay even after the substituted third proviso to subsection 2A to Section 254 of the Act was introduced.

    CIT vs Tata Teleservices (Maharashtra) Ltd

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 9746 (HC-BOMBAY)

  4. Bombay High Court · 24 Dec 2015
    HC - No TDS u/s 195 on commission payments to non-resident agents in respect of sales made outside India.

    CIT vs. Gujarat Reclaim & Rubber Products Ltd.

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 9735 (HC-BOMBAY)

  5. Bombay High Court · 21 Dec 2015
    Transfer Pricing: An adjustment with respect to transfer pricing has to be confined to transactions with Associated Enterprises and cannot be made with respect to transactions with unrelated third parties

    CIT v. Thyssen Krupp

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 9731 (HC-BOMBAY)

  6. Bombay High Court · 21 Dec 2015
    Thought there is a difference between leasehold right and ownership right as per the Transfer of Property Act, a leasehold land in the possession of the assessee for a term of 95 years is "belonging" to the assessee and is liable for wealth-tax

    Jaya Hind Sciaky v. DCIT

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 9730 (HC-BOMBAY)

  7. Bombay High Court · 21 Dec 2015
    Commission earned by a non-resident agent who carried on business of selling Indian goods outside India cannot be said have deemed to be income which has accrued and/or arisen in India. Circular No. 23 of 1969 & Circular No.786 of 2000 were withdrawn on 22.10.2009. The withdrawal of a Circular cannot have retrospective operation

    CIT v. Gujarat Reclaim & Rubber Products

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 9729 (HC-BOMBAY)

  8. Bombay High Court · 14 Dec 2015
    HC - Expenditure incurred on stamp duty for acquiring leasehold land for 30 years period is revenue in nature.

    CIT vs. Reliance Industrial Infrastructure Ltd.

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 9673 (HC-BOMBAY)

  9. Bombay High Court · 08 Dec 2015
    HC - As there was delay of only a day, CBDT-order rejecting condonation in filing belated return quashed.

    Cosme Matias Menezes vs. CIT

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 9626 (HC-BOMBAY)

  10. Bombay High Court · 27 Nov 2015
    S. 32/ 43(6): Even assets installed in a discontinued business are eligible for depreciation as part of 'block of assets'

    CIT vs. Sonic Biochem Extractions Pvt. Ltd

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 9551 (HC-BOMBAY) · Sections 32, 43(6)

  11. Bombay High Court · 06 Nov 2015
    HC - No deduction u/s 37 in absence of evidence to prove expenditure for ten years block period.

    Harish Textile Engrs Ltd. vs. DCIT

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 9357 (HC-BOMBAY) · Section. 292C

  12. Bombay High Court · 29 Oct 2015
    HC - Expenditure incurred by assessee (an advocate) in connection with treatment of his eyes is not allowable u/s 37

    Dhimant Hiralal Thakar vs. CIT

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 9286 (HC-BOMBAY) · Section. 37

  13. Bombay High Court · 13 Oct 2015
    S. 148: If Dept behaves in an irresponsible manner and does not furnish the record reasons on the basis that the assessee was already aware of them, the assessment has to be quashed

    CIT vs. Trend Electronics

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 9163 (HC-BOMBAY) · Section 148

  14. Bombay High Court · 13 Oct 2015
    Dept directed to follow directions of Delhi High Court in 352 ITR 273 and to be vigilant and ensure that such mistakes do not occur. Dept directed to set up a self-auditing vigilance cell to redress taxpayers' grievances

    Arun Ganesh Jogdeo vs. UOI

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 9161 (HC-BOMBAY)

  15. Bombay High Court · 14 Oct 2015
    HC - Amount received by India branch of a German company for rendering ISO 9000 certification and audit services is not taxable as FTS under Sec 9(1)(vii) or under Article 12 of India-Germany DTAA.

    DIT. vs. TUV Bayren (I) Ltd.

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 9148 (HC-BOMBAY)

  16. Bombay High Court · 12 Oct 2015
    For filing frivolous appeals and harassing taxpayers, heavy/exemplary costs to be imposed which will have to be personally paid by the jurisdictional CIT who sanctioned filing of the appeal

    CIT vs. Proctor and Gamble Home Products Ltd

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 9145 (HC-BOMBAY)

  17. Bombay High Court · 06 Oct 2015
    HC - Cost of abandoned film is Revenue Expenditure.

    CIT. vs. Venus Records and Tapes P Ltd.

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 9072 (HC-BOMBAY)

  18. Bombay High Court · 07 Oct 2015
    HC - No addition of cash withdrawals from bank when credit receipts in bank already taxed

    Commissioner of Income-tax – 21 v. Jalaj Batra

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 9066 (HC-BOMBAY) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=58737&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  19. Bombay High Court · 02 Oct 2015
    Strictures passed against CBDT for causing ‘very unfair discrimination' between taxpayers by extending due date for filing ROI only for taxpayers in P&H and Gujarat and not for those in other States

    The Chamber Of Tax Consultants vs. UOI

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 9023 (HC-BOMBAY)

  20. Bombay High Court · 30 Sep 2015
    CBDT directed to forthwith issue an order u/s 119 to extend the due date for filing ROI to 31.10.2015

    The Chamber Of Tax Consultants vs. UOI

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 9007 (HC-BOMBAY) · Section. 119

Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload ×

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.