Search
Advanced Search Search with field filters
/adv
Navigation
Home Go to homepage
/home
Direct Tax Income Tax resources
GST GST Acts, Rules & Case Laws
Company Law Companies Act & SEBI
Due Date Tracker Statutory compliance deadlines
/due
Due Date Calendar Calendar view of compliance deadlines
Daily Digest Today's tax updates and articles
/digest
Landmark Rulings

Bombay High Court — Direct Tax

1,071 rulings

  1. Bombay High Court · 08 Jul 2016
    Mesne profits (amount received from a person in wrongful possession of property) is a capital receipt and not chargeable to tax either as income or as "book profits" u/s 115JB. As the department has implicitly accepted Narang Overseas vs. ACIT 100 ITD (Mum) (SB), it cannot file an appeal on the issue in the case of other assessees

    CIT vs. Goodwill Theatres Pvt. Ltd

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10604 (HC-BOMBAY)

  2. Bombay High Court · 07 Jul 2016
    S. 68: The assessee is bound to be provided with the material used against him apart from being permitted to cross examine the deponents. The denial of such opportunity goes to root of the matter and strikes at the very foundation of the assessment order and renders it vulnerable

    H. R. Mehta vs. ACIT

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10577 (HC-BOMBAY) · Section 68

  3. Bombay High Court · 06 Jul 2016
    Severe strictures passed at the attitude of the Government in creating “hurdles and obstacles in the smooth working and functioning of all the tribunals and courts” and the fact that the “State has yet to adopt a culture of respect and regard for the judiciary”. Directions given that issue of allotment of residential quarters to Tribunal Members should not be kept a “closely guarded secret” but made public

    Sales Tax Tribunal Bar Association vs. The State of Maharashtra

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10572 (HC-BOMBAY)

  4. Bombay High Court · 28 Jun 2016
    S. 148 notice issued to, and reassessment order passed on, a non-existing entity is without jurisdiction. A writ petition can be entertained despite the presence of alternate remedy

    Jitendra Chandralal Navlani vs. UOI

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10475 (HC-BOMBAY) · Section 148

  5. Bombay High Court · 13 Jun 2016
    S. 10(38)/ 69: Fact that a small amount invested in "penny" stocks gave rise to huge capital gains in a short period does not mean that the transaction is "bogus" if the documentation and evidences cannot be faulted

    CIT vs. Mukesh Ratilal Marolia

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10338 (HC-BOMBAY) · Sections 10(38), 69

  6. Bombay High Court · 30 May 2016
    Reluctance of AOs to comply with binding Court judgements leads to negative reactions amongst business entities doing business in India and hurts National pride and image. Hereafter non-compliance with orders would visit officials with individual penalties, including forfeiture of salaries

    Larsen & Toubro Limited vs. UOI

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10272 (HC-BOMBAY)

  7. Bombay High Court · 17 May 2016
    Inability of the assessee, an Advocate, to reconcile the professional receipts with the TDS certificates and to give a detailed party-wise breakup of fees receipts does not mean that the difference can be assessed as undisclosed income

    CIT. vs. S. Ganesh

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10223 (HC-BOMBAY)

  8. Bombay High Court · 18 May 2016
    HC - Expenses incurred after closure of unit arising out of statutory compulsion are allowable u/s 37(1).

    Commissioner of Income Tax-7 Versus M/s. Nicholas Piramal (India) Ltd.

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10205 (HC-BOMBAY) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=65285&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  9. Bombay High Court · 16 May 2016
    Transfer Pricing: High Court irked at fact that Dept is unaware of which of its matters are admitted/ dismissed. Chief CIT directed to streamline the procedure for filing appeal before the High Court. Adjustment can be made only for transactions attributable to the International taxation

    CIT vs. TCL India Holdings Pvt. Ltd

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10197 (HC-BOMBAY)

  10. Bombay High Court · 25 Apr 2016
    S. 147: If the assessee responds to the S. 142(1)/ 143(2) notices, it means that he has submitted to the AO's jurisdiction and is estopped for filing a Writ Petition to challenge the same. The fact that the jurisdiction is challenged while participating in the proceedings is irrelevant

    Amaya Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd vs. ITO

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10146 (HC-BOMBAY) · Sections 142(1), 143(2), 147

  11. Bombay High Court · 21 Apr 2016
    HC - Tribunal's order passed without dealing with its co-ordinate bench ruling makes the order a nonspeaking order and in breach of principles of natural justice.

    DSP Investment Private Limited vs. ACIT

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10131 (HC-BOMBAY) · Section. 14A

  12. Bombay High Court · 20 Apr 2016
    Fundamental principles of accrual of income under mercantile system of accounting explained in the context of waiver of income recoverable from person facing financial difficulties

    CIT. vs. Neon Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10130 (HC-BOMBAY)

  13. Bombay High Court · 20 Apr 2016
    Failure by ITAT to grant an adjournment requested due to bereavement results in breach of principles of natural justice

    Zuari Global Ltd. vs. Pr. CIT

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10128 (HC-BOMBAY)

  14. Bombay High Court · 20 Apr 2016
    S. 14A/ Rule 8D: Non-consideration by the ITAT of a judgement of the co-ordinate Bench makes the order a non-speaking one and breaches the principles of natural justice

    DSP Investment Pvt. Ltd vs. ACIT

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10127 (HC-BOMBAY) · Section 14A

  15. Bombay High Court · 20 Apr 2016
    Mere non-introduction of interest-bearing funds is not sufficient to conclude that gains from sale of shares are not business income

    Pine Tree Finserve Pvt. Ltd vs. CIT

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10126 (HC-BOMBAY)

  16. Bombay High Court · 18 Apr 2016
    HC - Since conduct of petitioner not being forthcoming, this is not a fit case to exercise extraordinary writ jurisdiction in foreign asset reassesment case.

    Soignee R. Kothari vs. DCIT

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10119 (HC-BOMBAY)

  17. Bombay High Court · 15 Apr 2016
    HC - Letting out premises by trust to educational institute for rent is in consonance with object of “advancement of education”. First proviso to Sec. 2(15) is inapplicable.

    DIT(Exemptions) vs. Lala Lajpatrai Memorial Trust

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10114 (HC-BOMBAY) · Section. 2(15)

  18. Bombay High Court · 15 Apr 2016
    S. 147: Though assessee claims that she is a non-resident & that onus is on the revenue to show that the money in the HSBC Geneva account is taxable in India, the non-cooperation with the Revenue by signing the consent waiver form shows that she has something to hide and makes it an unfit case for exercise of writ jurisdiction

    Soignee R. Kothari vs. DCIT

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10112 (HC-BOMBAY) · Section 147

  19. Bombay High Court · 13 Apr 2016
    S. 45/ 48: Deferred consideration dependent on a contingency does not accrue unless the contingency has occurred and is not liable to capital gains tax in year of transfer

    CIT vs. Hemal Raju Shete

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10101 (HC-BOMBAY) · Sections 45, 48

  20. Bombay High Court · 12 Apr 2016
    HC - Contributions received by assessee-association cannot be chargeable to tax merely because assessee invested surplus amount in mutual funds.

    CIT. vs. Air Cargo Agents Association of India

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10097 (HC-BOMBAY)

Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload ×

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.